We are not trying to persuade you to avoid looking for other Generate hype … it was initially to gauge interest andįigure out if this product was a good investment for us. The reason we’ve been open about the entire process isn’t to
#Omnifocus 3 release date windows#
In the worst case, where the actual product is some combination of late, non-existent, and significantly divergent from the original promised description ( cough, cough, Windows Vista), it leads to disappointment. The reason vaporware is almost universally considered a pejorative is that even in the best case scenario, where the finished product does ship within a reasonable timeframe and strongly resembles the original promise of the product, it’s seen a predatory marketing practice. Sharps’s “it’s not vaporware” claim is really only tenable given the (rather crummy) Wiktionary definitions. Publicized and has passed its announced release date withoutīeing made available 2. Merriam-Webster: “A computer-related product that hasīeen widely advertised but has not and may never become Release (which may or may not actually take place).” The Jargon File: “Products announced far in advance of any Promoted or marketed while it is still in development and that Random House Unabridged: “A product, esp.
#Omnifocus 3 release date software#
It is only a concept or because it is still being written orĪmerican Heritage Dictionary, 4th Ed.: “New software that has beenĪnnounced or marketed but has not been produced.”
1: “Software or hardware that hasīeen advertised but is not yet available to buy, either because Here are a few definitions for “vaporware”: But simply stating that OmniFocus is not vaporware doesn’t alter the fact that OmniFocus is vaporware. To offer, and not touting magical features that we have no ideaĬlearly, to Sharps, “vaporware” is a pejorative term. There’s aĭifference, and it has to do with being sincere about what we want That-Which-Triggers-Kernel-Panic, but hey, that’s why it’s not inīut it’s not vaporware. Maybe our internal nickname for OmniFocus is Crashy Von CrashaLot,
In its current state, OmniFocus is a little bit crashy, too. That was supposed to be the base of all these fantastic offeringsĭid nothing more than crash your entire system and maybe theĬomputer of the person sitting next to you for good measure. Salespeople were talking to, and the half-built, buggy technology
They did notĮxist, the “features” they offered varied based on who the Those products were vaporware, pure and simple. Her defense starts with a description of the non-existent products peddled by one of her former (unnamed) employers: That seemed to strike a nerve, as it prompted this response from Sharps, “ Vaporware, pre-announcements, and conch-bleatings (oh my)”, wherein she expends 700 words denying that OmniFocus is vaporware. I linked to it using the title “ Just a Little Reminder to Let Us Know That OmniFocus Is Still Vaporware”, and wrote: “This is why you shouldn’t pre-announce apps.” The point of the post seemed to be that while Omni is happy that people are excited about OmniFocus, Omni is not happy that people are badgering them for status updates.
The entry was titled “ OmniFocus: not really an update”. On Monday, Linda Sharps, marketing manager for The Omni Group, posted an entry to Omni’s company weblog regarding their forthcoming “GTD” task management application, OmniFocus.
0 kommentar(er)
